Skip to content

Debunked: SEO & GEO Tactics That Don’t Work

llms.txt, schema-for-citations, purchased mentions and other tactics the studies debunk — with the evidence, so you stop paying for them.

  1. 1,885 treated vs 4,000 control pages: AIO -4.6%, AI Mode +2.4% (ns), ChatGPT +2.2% (ns); Google: no special schema needed. Keep schema for rich results/entity disambiguation only; note one practitioner claims HowTo 1.7x - unreplicated

    How to implement →
    GEOLarge study
  2. Ahrefs 137K domains: 97% of llms.txt files got ZERO traffic in May 2026, 96% of remaining fetches were bots; no AI bot ever requests a missing one; Google lists it as a myth. Only real use: docs for AI coding tools (Claude-Code = #2 fetcher)

    How to implement →
    GEOOfficial guidance
  3. Viral 'a16z declared SEO dead + here's my mega prompt' posts (200K+ views) sell prompts/files that do nothing; every serious study shows SEO fundamentals drive AI visibility; AI tools are ~2% of referral traffic vs search 24% (SimilarWeb Jan 2026)

    How to implement →
    GEOX/TwitterPractitioner claim

Browse all disciplines on the full best-practices ranking.